Meta-Analysis: Validity and Practicality of Student Worksheet Development (LKPD) Oriented Project Based Learning (PjBL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33477/bs.v13i2.7410Abstract
The learning process is gradual, starting from simple to complex, with an emphasis on the use of learning media such as LKPD. One learning model that can be used to vary the LKPD is the Project Based Learning (PjBL) model. This model can increase student engagement and interaction while increasing their drive to learn biology concepts. The aim of this research is to evaluate the validity and practicality of PjBL-based LKPD. The research method is meta-analysis, which is a technique that involves the collection of related articles from relevant sources, namely Google Scholar. Fifteen artivles related to the development of PjBL-based LKPD. Based on the results of the analysis, the development of PjBL-based LKPD meets the criteria of being very valid and very practical so it is suitable for use in learning. The research findings produced an average practicality score of 89.71% in the very practical category and an average validity score of 89.58% in the very valid category.
Keywords: Student Worksheet, Meta-Analysis, Project Based Learning
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
