Urgensi Hukum Responsif Di Masa Pandemi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33477/da.v14i1.6459Abstract
This article wants to examine the phenomenon of public disobedience to various government policies in preventing the spread of covid-19. The author is of the view that this non-compliance should be answered by the government by using a responsive legal model in handling COVID-19. This article departs from the responsive legal theory proposed by Philipe Nonet and Philip Selznick. With responsive legal theory, we can see that public disobedience gives the message that the legal model used by the government in dealing with COVID-19 is largely autonomous and repressive law. This study uses a sociology of law approach with empirical legal research methods. In addition to searching documents both offline and online, we also use direct observation in data collection. This observation was carried out in Maluku.References
Saputra, R. (2020). Kedaruratan Dalam Perspektif Hukum Responsif: Studi Kasus Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar di Indonesia. Krtha Bhayangkara. 14(2).
Rystiawati, A. (2020). Efektifitas Kebijakan Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar Dalam masa Pandemi Corona Virus 2019 Oleh pemerintah Sesuai Amanat UUD RI Tahun 1945. Administrative Law & Governance Journal. 3(2).
Arianto, H., (2010). Hukum Responsif dan Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Lex Jurnalica, 7(2),
Sholahudin, U. (2016). Hukum dan Keadilan Masyarakat (Analisis Sosiologi Hukum terhadap Kasus Hukum Masyarakat Miskin “Asyani” di Kabupaten Situbondo). Dimensi: 9(1)
Fajar, M. dan Achmad, Y. (2010). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Empiris & Normatif. Pustaka Pelajar
Weissleder, at.al. (2020). COVID-19 diagnostics in context. Science Translational Medicine. 12.
Nawangsari, E.R. dkk., (2021). Syntax Transformation. 2 (5)
Pujaningsih, N., dan Sucithawathi, I.G.A.AG. (2020). Penerapan Kebijakan Pembatasan Kegiatan Masyarakat (PKM) Dalam Penanggulangan Wabah Covid-19 Di Kota Denpasar. Jurnal Moderat: 6(3)
