EVERYDAY RELIGION: TAWARAN METODE PENELITIAN SOSIAL BAGI PENGEMBANGAN STUDI ISLAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33477/jsi.v10i2.2345Keywords:
everyday religion, metode penelitian sosial, studi IslamAbstract
Religion in contemporary sociological studies does not only talk about official discourse, but also everyday lived. This paper describes "everyday lived" or "live religion". Through qualitative approaches and descriptive methods can be explained, religion and spirituality based on everyday lived can be analyzed through ordinary people in their daily religious practices. Everyday religion displays a different dynamic, which is freer from political construction. Everyday religion views agency as important, without neglecting structure. Structure refers to the ability of institutions to produce (and enforce) a pattern of meaning and action; agency refers to the individual or collective ability to improvise and bring alternatives to life. The study of "lived religion" can be an inspiration for the development of Islamic studies in various Islamic universities, especially the studies of the Qur'an and Hadith.
Agama dalam kajian sosiologi kontemporer tidak semata-mata membicarakan official discourse, melainkan everyday lived. Tulisan ini mendeskripsikan "everyday lived" atau "live religion". Melalui pendekatan kualitatif dan metode deskriptif dapat dijelaskan, agama dan sipiritualitas berdasarkan everyday lived dapat dianalisis melalui orang-orang biasa dalam praktik keagamaan sehari-hari. Everyday religion menampilkan dinamika yang berbeda, yang lebih bebas dari konstruksi politik. Everyday religion memandang penting agensi, tanpa mengabaikan struktur. Struktur mengacu pada kemampuan lembaga untuk memproduksi (dan memaksakan) suatu pola pemaknaan dan tindakan; agensi mengacu pada kemampuan individu atau kolektif untuk melakukan improvisasi dan menghidupkan alternatif-alternatif. Studi "lived religion" dapat menjadi inspirasi bagi pengembangan studi Islam di berbagai perguru-an tinggi Islam, terutama kajian-kajian Al-Qur'an dan Hadis.
References
Aini, A. F. 2015. “Living Hadis dalam Tradisi Malam Kamis Majelis Shalawat Diba ‟Bil-Mustofa”, Ar-Raniry, International Journal of Islamic Studies, 2 (1).
Ammerman, N.T. (2003). “Religious Identities and Religious Institutions.” in Hand-book of the Sociology of Religion, edited by M. Dillon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ammerman, N.T., ed. (2007). Everyday Religion: Observing Modern Religious Lives. New York: Oxford University Press.
Asad, T. (2001). “Reading a Modern Classic: WC Smith’s The Meaning and End of Religion”. History of Religions, 40(3): 205-222.
Berglund, J. 2014. "An Ethnographic Eye of Religion in Everyday Life", Britisih Journal of Religious Education, 36 (1), 39-52.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Durkheim, E. 1898. (1975). “Individualism and the Intellectuals”, Durkheim on Religion, edited by W. S. F. Pickering, 59–73. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Fuad, A. F. N. (2015). "Islamisme dan Dakwah di Indonesia: Perspektif dan Pengalaman Dakwah Gerakan Tarbiyah", Komunika, 10 (1), 1-92.
Griffith, R. M. (2004). Born Again Bodies: Flesh and Spirit in American Christianity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Hall, D. (1997). Lived Religion in America: Toward A History of Practice. Princeton University Press.
Luckmann, T. (1967). The Invisible Religion. New York: Macmillan.
Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
McGuire, M. (2008). Lived Religion: Faith and Practice in Everyday Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nanji, A. (1997). “Introduction”, dalam Nanji A. (ed.), Mapping Islamic Studies: Genea-logy, Continuity, and Change, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Orsi, R. (2002). The Madonna of 115th Street: Faith and Community in Italian Harlem, 1880-1950. Yale University Press.
Parsons, T. (1964). “Religion and Modern Industrial Society”, Religion, Culture, and Society, edited by L. Schneider, 273–98. New York: Wiley.
Putra, H. S. A. (2012). “Paradigma Ilmu Sosial-Budaya: Sebuah Pandangan”, Makalah, Disampaikan dalam Shortcourse Metodologi Penelitian Kerjasama Direktorat Pergu-ruan Tinggi Islam Kemenag RI dan Program Studi Agama dan Lintas Budaya (CRCS), Sekolah Pascasarjana, UGM.
Qudsy, S. Z. (2016). "Living Hadis: Genealogi, Teori, dan Aplikasi", Jurnal Living Hadis, 1, (1), 177-196.
Saputro. M. E. (2015). "Everyday Qur’an di Era Post-Konsumerisme", Mutawâtir: Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadis, 5 (2), 179-200.
Somers, M. R. 1994. “The Narrative Constitution of Identity: A Relational and Network Approach”, Theory and Society 23, 605–49.
Syamsuddin, S. (2007). “Ranah-ranah Penelitian dalam Studi al-Qur‟an dan Hadis”, dalam M. Mansur dkk., Metodologi Penelitian Living Qur’an dan Hadis, Yogyakarta: TH Press.
Tobin, S. A. (2011). Everyday Piety: Negotiating Islam and the Economy in Amman, Jordan. Boston: Boston University.
