KERENDAHAN HATI RELASIONAL DALAM PROSES PEMBELAJARAN MEMPREDIKSI SKEMA RELIGUS PESERTA DIDIK DI DAERAH PASCA KONFLIK

Authors

  • Adam Latuconsina IAIN Ambon
  • Bahiya Gasam MIN 1 Ambon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33477/alt.v8i1.6300

Keywords:

1, relational humility, 2. religious schema, 3. post-conflict

Abstract

Lately, research on humility has begun to lead to the world of education. This is because relational humility facilitates a dialogic learning process that positively impacts students, namely the formation of religious schemes. Nonetheless, research on this topic has never been conducted on individuals living in post-interfaith conflict areas. Even though individuals who live in post-conflict areas have formed their humility and religious schemes. Does relational humility strongly predict the emergence of student religious schemas in post-conflict areas? This is the question that is explained in this study. This study used ex-post facto research with a sample of 49 students from four universities in Ambon City. The research data were obtained from the subjects' answers on two scales, namely the Rational Humility Scale (RHS) and the Religious Schema Scale (RSS). The results of a simple linear regression test prove that relational humility also predicts the religious schema of students living in post-religious conflict areas. Nonetheless, the predictive magnitude is minimal due to the limitations of the research sample. Therefore, it is recommended that further researchers consider the size of the research sample and the need to examine relational humility and religious schemas as a mediator or moderator variables for tolerant behavior in the educational context.

References

Alfano, M., K, L., Stey, P., Robinson, B., Christen, M., Yu, F., & Lapsley, D. (2017). Development and validation of a multi-dimensional measure of intellectual humility. PLoS One, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182950

Allgaier, K., Zettler, I., Wagner, W., Puttmann, S., & Trautwein, U. (2015). Honesty-humility in school: Exploring main and interaction effects on secondary school students’ antisocial and prosocial behavior. Learning and Individual Differences, 43(211–217). https://doi.org/x.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.005

Ardi, R., Tobing, D. H., Agustina, G. N., Iswahyudi, A. F., & Budiarti, D. (2021). Religious schema and tolerance towards alienated groups in Indonesia. Heliyon2, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07603

Blakemore, S.-J., & Mills, K. L. (2014). Is adolescence a sensitive period for sociocultural processing? Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-psych-010213-115202

Chan, Z. C., Tong, C. W., & Henderson, S. (2017). Power dynamics in the student-teacher relationship in clinical settings. Nurse Education Today, 49, 174–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.026

Davis, D. E., Hook, J. N., Worthington Jr, E. L., Tongeren, D. R. Van, Gartner, A. L., Jeannings Il, D. J., & Emmons, R. A. (2011). Relational humility: Conceptualizing and measuring humility as a personality judgment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(3), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.558871

Davis, D. E., Worthington Jr, E. L., Hook, J. N., Emmons, R. A., Hill, P. C., Bollinger, R. A., & Tongeren, D. R. Van. (2013). Humility and the development and repair of social bonds: Two longitudinal studies. Self and Identity, 12(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2011.636509

Farrelly, D., Kaplin, D., & Hernandez, D. (2021). A transformational approach to developing cultural humility in the classroom. Teaching of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628321990366

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.

Haga, S., & Olson, K. R. (2016). “If I only had a little humility, I would be perfect”: Children’s and adults’ perceptions of intellectually arrogant, humble, and diffident people. The Journal of Positive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1167943

Haggard, M., Rowatt, W. C., Leman, J. C., Meagher, B., Moore, C., Fergus, T., Whitcomb, D., Battaly, H., Baehr, J., & Howard-Synder, D. (2018). Finding middle ground between intellectual arrogance and intellectual servility: Development and assessment of the limitations-owning intellectual humility scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 124, 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.014

Hook, J. N., Davis, D. E., Tongeren, D. R. Van, Hill, P. C., Worthington Jr, E. L., Farrell, J. E., & Dieke, P. (2015). Intellectual humility and forgiveness of religious leaders. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(6), 499–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1004554

Hook, J. N., Farrell, J. E., Johnson, K. A., Tongeren, D. R. Van, Davis, D. E., & Aten, J. D. (2016). Intellectual humilty and religious tolerance. The Journal of Positive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1167937

Jarvie, S., & Burke, K. J. (2019). Intellectual humility and the difficult knowledge of theology. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2018.1550452

Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J. (2016). Intellectual humility and prosocial values: Direct and mediated effects. The Journal of Positive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1167938

Kwok, M. L. J., Kwong, R., & Wong, M. (2022). How to facilitate motivational regulation strategies: Perspectives on teacher humility and teacher-student relationship. Computer & Education, 191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104645

Li, J. (2016). Humility in learning: A confucian perspective. Journal of Moral Educatioan. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2016.1168736

McElroy, S. E., Davis, D. E., Hook, J. N., & Battaly, H. D. (2023). Too much of a good thing: Differentiating intellectual humility from servility in higher education. Journal of Moral Educatioan, 52(1), 21–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2022.2126829

McElroy, S. E., Rice, K. G., Davis, D. E., Hook, J. N., Hill, P. C., Worthington Jr, E. L., & Tongeren, D. R. Van. (2014). Intellectual humility: Scale development and theoretical elaborations in the context of religious leadership. Journal of Psychology & Theology, 42(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/009164711404200103

Mulya, T. W., & Aditomo, A. (2019). Researching religious tolerance education using discourse analysis: A case study from Indonesia. British Journal of Religious Education, 41(4), 446–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2018.1556602

Oyer, B. J. (2015). Teacher perceptions of pricipals’ confidence, humility, and effectiveness. Journal of School Leadership, 25, 684–719.

Porter, T., Molina, D. C., Lucas, M., Oberle, C., & Trzesniewski, K. (2022). Classroom environment predicts changes in expressed intellectual humility. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 70. https://doi.org/1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102081

Porter, T., & Schumann, K. (2017). Intellectual humility and openness to the opposing view. Self and Identity. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2017.1361861

Rodriguez, D., Hook, J. N., Farrell, J. E., Mosher, D. K., Zhang, H., Tongeren, D. R. Van, Davis, D. E., Aten, J. D., & Hill, P. C. (2017). Religious intellectual humility, attitude change, and closeness following religious disagreement. The Journal of Positive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1388429

Ruffing, E. G., Oleson, D., Tomlinson, J., Park, S. H., & Sandage, S. J. (2021). Humility and relational spirituality as predictors of well-being among christian seminary students. Journal of Psychology & Theology, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091647121988968

Schillinger, J. (2012). Intellectual humility and interreligious dialogue between Christians and Muslims. Islam and Christian-Musim Relations, 23(3), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2012.688259

Streib, H., Hood, R. W., & Klein, C. (2010). The religious schema scale: Construction and initial validation of a quantitative measure for religious styles. The International Journal for the Psychology Religion, 20(3), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2010.481223

Tinkler, A. S., & Tinkler, B. (2016). Enhancing cultural humility through critical service-learning in teacher preparation. Multicultural Perspectives, 18(4), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2016.1222282

Tongeren, D. R. Van, Hakim, S., Hook, J. N., Johnson, K. A., Green, J. D., Hulsey, T. L., & Davis, D. E. (2016). Toward an understanding of religious tolerance: Quest religiousness and positive attitudes toward religiously dissmilar others. The International Journal for the Psychology Religion, 26(3), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2015.1039417

Willis, A. S. (2021). Teachers’ cultural, social and emotional capabilities: How teacher compassion and humility is an antecedent to student confidence. Pedagogy, Culture and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1884122

Wong, I. H. M., & Wong, T. T. Y. (2021). Exploring the relationship between intellectual humility and academic performance among post-secondary students: The mediating roles of learning motivation and receptivity to feedback. Learning and Individual Differences, 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102012

Woodruff, E., Tongeren, D. R. Van, McElroy, S. E., Davis, D. E., & Hook, J. N. (2014). Humility and religion: Benefits, difficulties, and a model of religious tolerance. In C. Kim-Prieto (Ed.), Religion and Spirituality Across Cultures (pp. 271–285). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8950-9_14

Zhang, H., Farrell, J. E., & Hook, J. N. (2015). Intellectual humility and forgiveness of religious conflict. Journal of Psychology & Theology, 43(4), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/00916471150430040

Downloads

Published

2023-07-26

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): Education and Learning

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.