FROM AWARENESS TO RHETORICAL CONTROL: STUDENT WRITERS’ HOOKS AND READER ENGAGEMENT IN ARGUMENTATIVE INTRODUCTIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33477/lingue.v8i1.14154Keywords:
argumentative introductions, argumentative writing, reader engagement, rhetorical awareness, rhetorical hooksAbstract
This study investigates students’ strategic use of hooks and their perceptions of hooks as rhetorical strategies for enhancing reader engagement, highlighting the gap between conceptual understanding and rhetorical execution. Employing a descriptive quantitative design combined with text-based rhetorical analysis, this study examined the argumentative introductions of 20 applied undergraduate students alongside questionnaire data covering five metacognitive dimensions. The analysis showed an uneven distribution of hook types, dominated by question hooks (45%), followed by scenario (25%) and statistical hooks (15%), while general (10%) and provoking statements (5%) were minimally used, indicating a restricted and formulaic repertoire. Questionnaire results revealed consistently high mean scores, namely awareness (M = 2.78), selection strategy (M = 2.70), reader engagement (M = 2.73), reader orientation (M = 2.76), and writing reflection (M = 2.74), suggesting strong perceived awareness. However, item-level findings exposed key gaps where only 45% reported using varied hooks, 65% considered audience and purpose, and just 20% expressed confidence in writing introductions. These results indicated that students’ awareness remained largely declarative and procedural rather than strategic and flexible. Despite demonstrating relatively high rhetorical awareness, students still exhibited limited rhetorical control, constrained variation, partial audience orientation, and low confidence in constructing introductions. This finding emphasizes the necessity of explicit modeling, strategic variation, audience-oriented practice, and iterative feedback. Overall, the findings positioned student writers within a transitional phase from awareness toward rhetorical control, where metacognitive understanding had not yet fully transformed into effective rhetorical performance.
References
Alfaraj, R., Ozdemir, B., Aljuffali, L., Alsabhan, J. F., Al Aloola, N., Alkofide, H., Aljadeed, R., Aljadeed, R., Alodaib, F., Alkhudair, N., Almalag, H. M., Bawazeer, G. A., Alnaim, L. S., & Altuwaijri, N. (2026). Metacognitive awareness and confidence as predictors of academic performance in pharmacy students: Insights from grade predictions and structural equation modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, 1720303. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1720303
Aminah, M., Iskandar, I., & Dewanti, R. (2025). Exploring challenges in academic writing: A case study of final-year English Education students. International Seminar on Humanity, Education, and Language, 1(1), 319–324.
Berger, J., Moe, W. W., & Schweidel, D. A. (2023). What holds attention? Linguistic drivers of engagement. Journal of Marketing, 87(5), 793–809.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429231152880
Dang, T. H., Chau, T. H., & Tra, T. Q. (2020). A study on the difficulties in writing argumentative essays of English-majored sophomores at Tay Do University, Vietnam. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(1), 201–240.
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v6i1.3389
Dewi, U. (2021). Students’ perceptions: Using writing process approach in EFL writing class. AL-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(2), 988–997.
https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i2.555
Dontcheva-Navrátilová, O. (2021). Engaging with the reader in research articles in English: Variation across disciplines and linguacultural backgrounds. English for Specific Purposes, 63, 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.02.003
Eriyani, E. (2020). Metacognition awareness and its correlation with academic achievement of educational students. Indonesian Research Journal in Education, 4(1), 78–87. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/irje/article/view/8573
Febriani, T. N. (2022). “Writing is challenging”: Factors contributing to undergraduate students’ difficulties in writing English essays. Erudita: Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(1), 83–93.
Gerald, C., & Mukuka, J. (2025). A systematic review of introduction approaches in essay writing studies: A comparative analysis. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 51(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i11725
Ghanbari, N., & Salari, M. (2022). Problematizing argumentative writing in an Iranian EFL undergraduate context. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 862400.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.862400
Halum, Y. S. (2024). The rhetorical moves in the students’ introduction parts of theses writing. TELL-US Journal, 10(3), 848–866.
https://doi.org/10.22202/tus.2024.v10i4.8323
Jarunthawatchai, O. C., Jarunthawatchai, W., & Gilbert, L. (2025). Connecting reading and writing in foreign language instruction: A process-genre approach. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 18(2), 493–518. https://doi.org/10.70730/SOGP3675
Klein, R., Jiang, J., Huang, K., Zeng, H., Gong, D., & Martinez, D. (2026). A dual-ZPD design framework for AI-supported learning. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’26). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3791476
Lillejord, S., & Dysthe, O. (2008). Productive learning practice: A theoretical discussion based on two cases. Journal of Education and Work, 21(1), 75–89.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080801957154
Lingard, L. (2022). Writing for the reader: Using reader expectation principles to maximize clarity. Perspectives on Medical Education, 11(4), 228–231.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-022-00708-w
Mallahi, O. (2024). Exploring the status of argumentative essay writing strategies and problems of Iranian EFL learners. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00241-1
Nasihah, D., & Elfiyanto, S. (2022). Argumentative writing construction of EFL writing class through declarative speech acts approach. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 9(2), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v9i2.28522
Mar’atassolihah, A., & Widhiyanto, W. (2026). Exploring English education students’ challenges in writing an introduction for a journal article. Journal of English Language and Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v11i1.2077
Mubarak, Z. H., & Rudianto, G. (2021). Good hook as attention grabber in EFL student’s essays: A review from reader’s perspective. Jurnal BASIS, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.33884/basisupb.v7i2.2485
Nenotek, S. A., Tlonaen, Z. A., & Manubulu, H. A. (2022). Exploring university students’ difficulties in writing English academic essay. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(1), 909–920. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.1352
Parba, A. C., & Jajalla, J. D. (2026). An assessment on the metacognitive awareness among teacher education students: A convergent parallel study. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation, 4(1).
Putri, R. E., Nasution, M., Prananda, P., & Rasya, M. (2025). From taste to text: A corpus-based analysis of figurative language patterns and rhetorical quality in novice EFL culinary descriptions. Journal of Research in English Language Teaching (JR-ELT), 9(2), 265–287.
https://jrelt.ftk.uinjambi.ac.id/index.php/jrelt/article/view/136/101
Rahman, Y. A. (2020). Delving the hook sentence in argumentative essay: Finding the writers’ preferences of catchy sentence. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 6(1), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v6i1.292
Riphasa, M. S. (2024). Exploring students’ challenges in academic writing at department of English education, UIN Suska Riau. In faculty of education and teacher training [Thesis]. State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau.
Rofiqoh, M., & Chakim, N. (2020). Students’ perceptions on written and oral feedback in writing class. RETAIN: Journal of Research in English Language Teaching), 8(2), 57–65.
Rosegard, E., & Wilson, J. (2013). Capturing students’ attention: An empirical study. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(5), 1–20.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1017063.pdf
Rustipa, K., Purwanto, S., & Rozi, F. (2023). Rhetorical structures, strategies, and linguistic features of problem statement to promote a teaching writing model. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(2), 575–597.
https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i2.30855
Sari, E. D. P., & Agustina, M. F. (2022). Students’ introductory paragraph in writing academic essay. ELTIN Journal: Journal of English Language Teaching in Indonesia, 10(2), 167–174. https://doi.org/10.22460/eltin.v10i2.p167-174
Tavakol, M., & O’Brien, D. (2023). The importance of crafting a good introduction to scholarly research: Strategies for creating an effective and impactful opening statement. International Journal of Medical Education, 14, 208–210.
https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.6496.9dce
Tiwery, D. S., Fikri, M. S., Amalia, N., Hidayat, F., Huan, E., Putri, R. E., Mora, H., Ambalegin, Bannus, D. A., Noviarini, T., Herawati, Y. W., Rahayu, G., & Ningsih, A. M. (2026). Fundamental teaching English: Theory, practice and classroom application. CV. Gita Lentera.
Yunita, W., & Maisarah, I. (2020). Students’ perception on learning language at the graduate program of English education amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Linguists: Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 6(2), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.29300/ling.v6i2.3718
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
If accepted for publication, the copyright of the article belongs to the author. Copyright includes the exclusive right to reproduce or transmit manuscripts in any form and media: reprint, produce photographs, microfilm, or translated versions of the manuscript. Increasing parts of this journal, storage and transmission of databases of any form or media, such as electronic copies, electrostatic and mechanical copies, photocopies, recordings, magnetic media and so on are permitted without permission. LINGUE: Jurnal Bahasa, Budaya dan Sastra, allow readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link the fulltext of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. However, it can not be used for commercial purposes
Jika diterima untuk publikasi, hak cipta artikel adalah milik penulis. Hak Cipta mencakup hak eksklusif untuk mereproduksi atau mengirimkan manuskrip dalam bentuk dan media apa pun: mencetak ulang, menghasilkan foto, mikrofilm, atau versi terjemahan dari manuskrip tersebut. Memperbanyak bagian jurnal ini, penyimpanan dan transmisi database dalam bentuk atau media apa pun, seperti salinan elektronik, salinan elektrostatis dan mekanis, fotokopi, rekaman, media magnetis, dan sebagainya diizinkan tanpa izin. LINGUE: Jurnal Bahasa,Budaya dan Sastra, memungkinkan pembaca untuk membaca, mengunduh, menyalin, mendistribusikan, mencetak, mencari, atau menautkan teks lengkap artikelnya dan memungkinkan pembaca untuk menggunakannya untuk tujuan yang sah lainnya. Namun, tidak dapat digunakan untuk tujuan komersial
LINGUE : Jurnal Bahasa, Budaya, dan Sastra Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-TanpaTurunan 4.0 Internasional.
