SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS IN FORENSIC LINGUISTICS: THE MEANING OF SYMBOLS IN THE TEMPO NEWS OFFICE TERRORISM CASE

Authors

  • Muhammad Musawir Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Rahma Fitri Alifah University of Tsukuba

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33477/lingue.v7i1.9473

Keywords:

forensic linguistics, pig’s head, symbolic violence, threat communication, rat carcass

Abstract

Abstract

The act of terror against the Tempo Newsroom through the delivery of physical symbols such as a pig’s head and rat carcasses represents a complex form of threatening communication laden with symbolic meaning. This study examines how the symbolic meanings of these acts of terror can be interpreted through a semiotic approach within the framework of forensic linguistics, and how such symbols function as a form of non-verbal threat communication. The objective of this research is to analyze the pig’s head and rat carcasses as cultural signs used in the context of intimidation against independent media. This qualitative descriptive research employs semiotic theories (Saussure and Peirce), Bourdieu’s theory of symbolic violence, and forensic linguistic analysis of indirect speech acts. Data were obtained through document analysis of online news reports, public statements, and relevant academic literature. The findings reveal that the pig’s head and rat carcasses function as symbolic representamen socially constructed as acts of humiliation and warning. These signs carry connotations of impurity, filth, and threats directed at press institutions as a means of controlling freedom of expression. The symbols serve as indirect speech acts that are coercive and intimidating. The study concludes that symbolic violence in the form of non-verbal physical terror can serve as an effective tool of domination, especially when interpreted within the socio-political and cultural context in which it occurs.

References

Albuquerque, R. N. de. (2024). Semiótica Jurídica: O Discurso Jurídico E A

Interpretação Do Fenômeno Linguístico Consubstanciada Na Linguagem Para

A Compreensão Da Lei E Sua Aplicabilidade. Duc In Altum - Cadernos de

Direito, 16(39), Article 39. https://doi.org/10.22293/2179507x.v17i39.3015.

Azhniuk, L. V. (2022). Threat As An Object of Forensic Linguistics. Movoznavstvo,

323 (2), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.33190/0027-2833-323-2022-2-003.

Baranov, A. (2020). Speech and Gesture in Forensic Linguistics in Bribery Case:

Towards Semantics and Pragmatics of “Closed” Discourses. Vestnik

Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 2. Jazykoznanije, 1,

64–76. https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2020.1.6

Barthes, R. (1967). Elements of Semiology. https://scispace.com/papers/elements-ofsemiology-3g61rlhvgb.

Corduneanu-Huci, C., & and Hamilton, A. (2022). Selective Control: The Political Economy of Censorship. Political Communication, 39(4), 517–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2074587

Fakih, A. (2024). Media Under the Law: Press Freedom Challenges in Indonesia. Indonesia Media Law Review, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/imrev.v3i1.78900141.

Fatmawati, N. I. (2020). Pierre Bourdieu dan Konsep Dasar Kekerasan Simbolik. Madani Jurnal Politik dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 12(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.52166/madani.v12i1.1899.

Hammadi, S. S., & AL-Ahmedi, M. W. A. (2015). A Semiotic Analysis of Threat and Warning Symbols in George Orwell’s Novel 1984. International Journal of Research, 2(11), Article 11.

Hoogervorst, T., & Jákl, J. (2024). Fearsome Game, Popular Meat, Symbolic Wealth: Human-Pig Relations in Pre-Islamic Java. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306- bja10197.

Husain, S. (2023). Power Politics and Media: An Understanding of Their Interplay. RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 8(8), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2023.v08.n08.012.

Innis, R. (1985). Semiotics: An introductory anthology. Bloomington : Indiana University Press. http://archive.org/details/semioticsintrodu0000unse.

Jurj, G. (2007). Signs in the medical context and the semiotic codes: An introduction

6206, 6 (20), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.51910/ijhdr.v6i20.26.

Kilby, L. (2016). Symbols of Terror: ‘9/11’ as the Word of the Thing and the Thing of the Word. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 46(2), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12097.

Kovkina, Y., Aloyan, M., & Avoyan, L. (2022). Relevance of Forensic Linguistic

Speech Analysis in Criminal Cases Regarding Threat Incrimination. Theory

and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 28(3), Article 3.

https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.3.2022.06.

Kramsch, C. (2020). Language as Symbolic Power. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108869386.

Larner, S. (2015). From intellectual challenges to established corpus techniques: Introduction to the special issue on forensic linguistics. Corpora, 10(2), 131– 143. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2015.0071.

McElvaney, T. J., Osman, M., & Mareschal, I. (2021). Perceiving threat in others: The role of body morphology. PLOS ONE, 16(4), e0249782. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249782.

Media, K. C. (2025a, March 21). Dewan Pers Kecam Teror terhadap Jurnalis Tempo,

Minta Aparat Bertindak Tegas. KOMPAS.com. terhadap-jurnalis-tempominta-aparat-bertindak-tegas

Media, K. C. (2025b, March 22). Sebelum Dikirimi 6 Bangkai Tikus, Tempo Diancam

Teror “Sampai Mampus Kantor Kalian.” KOMPAS.com.

https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2025/03/22/19280471/sebelumdikirimi-6-bangkai-tikus-tempo-diancam-teror-sampai-mampus-kantor.

Media, K. C. (2025c, March 22). Sebelum Dikirimi 6 Bangkai Tikus, Tempo Diancam

Teror “Sampai Mampus Kantor Kalian” Halaman 2. KOMPAS.com.142. https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2025/03/22/19280471/sebelumdikirimi-6-bangkai-tikus-tempo-diancam-teror-sampai-mampus-kantor.

Media, K. C. (2025d, March 22). Tempo Diteror Kepala Babi dan Bangkai Tikus,

Amnesty International: Usut Tuntas Dalangnya. KOMPAS.com.

https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2025/03/22/21290561/tempo-diterorkepala-babi-dan-bangkai-tikus-amnesty-international-usut.

Mozaheb, M. A., Shahiditabar, M., Torabi, K., & Hassani, P. (2018). An analysis of

azerbaijani turkish translations of civil and criminal ayas of the holy qur’an: A

forensic linguistic perspective. Foresic Research & Criminology International

Journal, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.15406/frcij.2018.06.00195.

Musawir, M., Amir, J., & Saleh, M. (2022). Honesty in Language in Special Fugitive

Scandal: Forensic Linguistic Studies in Broadcasting Talks Indonesia Lawyers

Club. Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Social Sciences Study, 3(1),

Article 1. https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrsss.v3i1.256.

Nöth, W. (2023). Semiotics. In J. E. Joseph, L. R. Waugh, & M. Monville-Burston (Eds.), The Cambridge History of Linguistics (pp. 859–884). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9780511842788.041

Ozyumenko, V., & Larina, T. (2020). Discourse of Threat as a Strategy of Emotional Persuasion and Manipulation https://www.academia.edu/66968671/Discourse_of_Threat_as_a_Strategy_o_Emotional_Persuasion_and_Manipulation.

Patnaik, U., & Chauhan, A. S. (2024). Derailing of Fourth Pillar of the Democracy

and Future of Accountable, Transparent Democratic System. IJFMR -

International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 6(2).

https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i02.14692.

Rahmat, W. (2015). Bahasa Ancaman dalam Teks Kaba Sabai Nan Aluih Berbasis Pendekatan Linguistik Forensik. Jurnal Arbitrer, 2(1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.2.1.81-97.2015.

Ravindran, V. (2019). Data Analysis in Qualitative Research. Indian Journal of Continuing Nursing Education, 20(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJCN.IJCN_1_19.

Rodrigues, A. (2008). Islam and Symbolism. Military Review. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Islam-and symbolismRodrigues/7ee54a6aa14080e7f7655c63830d2aacc128dd8b

Schmidt, J. A. (2022). Peirce’s evolving interpretants. Semiotica, 2022(246), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2020-0115.

Schubert, J. D. (2012). Suffering/symbolic violence. In M. Grenfell (Ed.), Pierre

Bourdieu: Key Concepts (2nd ed., pp. 179–194). Acumen Publishing.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/pierre-bourdieu/sufferingsymbolicviolence/E7A23471D9136B86482CC9807362CF3E143.

Sebeok, T. A. (2001). Signs: An introduction to semiotics (2nd ed). University of Toronto Press.

Shuy, R. W. (2023). Forensic Linguistics. In M. M. Houck (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences, Third Edition (Third Edition) (pp. 620–629). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823677-2.00005-2.

Sigdel, S. B. (2018). Culture and Symbolism Nexus in Anthropology. Janapriya Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3126/jjis.v7i1.23061.

Simandjuntak, M. E., Soerjowinoto, P., Wijaya, E. M. K., & Mumtazah, H. (2024). A

Snapshot of Violence and Criminalization Against Journalists in Indonesia:

Enhancing the Safety of Journalists. IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal

Law Studies), 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v9i1.48789.

Tempo, T. (2025a, March 28). Kronologi Detail Teror Kepala Babi dan Bangkai Tikus untuk Redaksi Tempo. Tempo.Co.https://www.tempo.co/politik/kronologi-detail-teror-kepala-babi-dan-bangkaitikus-untuk-redaksi-tempo-1225227.

Tempo, T. (2025b, March 28). Sepekan Teror di Tempo: Detik-detik Kepala Babi,

Ancaman dari Akun @derrynoah, dan 6 Bangkai Tikus. Tempo.Co.

https://www.tempo.co/hukum/sepekan-teror-di-tempo-detik-detik-kepalababi-ancaman-dari-akun-derrynoah-dan-6-bangkai-tikus-1225427.

Werdiningsih, E., & B, A. H. (2022). Lima Pendekatan dalam Penelitian Kualitatif. Likhitaprajna Jurnal Ilmiah, 24(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.37303/likhitaprajna.v24i1.217

Wessing, R. (2006). Symbolic Animals in the Land between the Waters: Markers of Place and Transition. Asian Folklore Studies, 65(2), 205–239.

Zhu, Z. (2024). Peirce’s philosophy of language. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 20(3), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2024-2025.

Баранов, А. Н. (2014, December 30). Феномен угрозы в лингвист ической т еории и эксперт ной практ ике. SciSpace - Paper. https://scispace.com/papers/fenomen-ugrozy-v-lingvisticheskoi-teorii-iekspertnoi-5ethb7detz.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-25

How to Cite

Muhammad Musawir, & Rahma Fitri Alifah. (2025). SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS IN FORENSIC LINGUISTICS: THE MEANING OF SYMBOLS IN THE TEMPO NEWS OFFICE TERRORISM CASE. Lingue : Jurnal Bahasa, Budaya, Dan Sastra, 7(1), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.33477/lingue.v7i1.9473