e-PORTFOLIO AS OLEA TO IDENTIFY HIGHER ABILITY FOR STUDENTS IN HIGHER EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33477/mp.v10i1.2786Keywords:
e-Portfolio, OLEA, Higher AbilityAbstract
The importance of high ability (HA) for students in higher education so that they show ability as a resource who is ready to face the challenges in today's competitive era. This research was conducted to identify HA by utilizing online learning environment activities (OLEA). OLEA is applied in the form of online lecture activities combined with the e-portfolio approach. This activity involved 32 people who came from students majoring in mathematics class C 2019. By using a questionnaire distributed via Google Form, the results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The results show that 1) the HA identification method with OLEA is good for motivating students to recognize their abilities, 2) OLEA needs to be designed in such a way as to initiate the development of students' HA, 3) the e-Portfolio approach is a good alternative to support OLEA.References
Clinkenbeard, P. (1994). Motivation and highly able students: Resolving paradoxes. Talent development: Theories and practice.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Abuhamdeh, S., & Nakamura, J. (2014). Flow. In Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 227–238). Springer.
Engeser, S., & Rheinberg, F. (2008). Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance. Motivation and Emotion, 32(3), 158–172.
Freeman, J. (1990). The intellectually gifted adolescent. Encouraging the Development of Exceptional Skills and Talents, 89–108.
Gallagher, J., Harradine, C. C., & Coleman, M. R. (1997). Challenge or boredom? Gifted students’ views on their schooling. Roeper Review, 19(3), 132–136.
Gentry, M., Gable, R. K., & Springer, P. (2000). Gifted and nongifted middle school students: Are their attitudes toward school different as measured by the new affective instrument, My Class Activities…? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 24(1), 74–95.
Heller, K. A. (1999). Individual (learning and motivational) needs versus instructional conditions of gifted education. High Ability Studies, 10(1), 9–21.
Hoekman, K., McCormick, J., & Gross, M. U. M. (1999). The optimal context for gifted students: A preliminary exploration of motivational and affective considerations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43(3), 170–193.
King, J., & South, J. (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in higher education. U.S. Dept. of Education - Office of Educational Technology, January, 107. https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/Higher-Ed-NETP.pdf
Klein, B. D., Rossin, D., Guo, Y. M., & Ro, Y. K. (2010). An Examination of the Effects of Flow on Learning in a Graduate-Level Introductory Operations Management Course. Journal of Education for Business, 85(5), 292–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320903449600
Lens, W., & Rand, P. (2000). Motivation and cognition: Their role in the development of giftedness. International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent, 2, 193–202.
Marra, R., & Palmer, B. (2004). Encouraging intellectual growth: Senior college student profiles. Journal of Adult Development, 11(2), 111–122.
Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2005). Jeanne Nakamura & Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Dædalus, Summer 200(May), 60–67.
Nasrullah; Baharman. (2018). Exploring Practical Responses of M3LC for Learning Literacy Exploring Practical Responses of M3LC for Learning Literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/954/1/012007
Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2010). Is there still a need for gifted education? An examination of current research. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(4), 308–317.
Sari, J., Nasrullah, & Mulbar, U. (2020). Deskripsi Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMA dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Program Linear ditinjau dari Kecerdasan Adversitas dan Efikasi Diri. Issues in Mathematics Education (IMED), 4(1), 52–67.
Sayler, M. F. (2009). Gifted and thriving: A deeper understanding of meaning of GT. In International Handbook on Giftedness (pp. 215–230). Springer.
Scager, K., Akkerman, S. F., Pilot, A., & Wubbels, T. (2014). Challenging high-ability students. Studies in Higher Education, 39(4), 659–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.743117
Shore, B. M., & Kanevsky, L. S. (1993). Thinking processes: Being and becoming gifted. International Handbook of Research and Development of Giftedness and Talent, 1, 133–147.
Su, B. (2009). Effective Technology Integration: Old Topic, New Thoughts. International Journal of Education & Development Using Information & Communication Technology, 5(2), 1–9. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.umhblib.umhb.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=58496383&site=ehost-live%5Cnhttp://0-content.ebscohost.com.umhblib.umhb.edu/ContentServer.asp?T=P&P=AN&K=58496383&S=R&D=ehh&EbscoContent=dGJyMNHr7ESep7E4zdnyOLCmr0ueqLFSsa+4S7
Vollmeyer, R., & Rheinberg, F. (2006). Motivational effects on self-regulated learning with different tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 18(3), 239–253.
Vorotnykova, I. P., & Zakhar, O. H. (2021). TEACHERS’READINESS TO USE E-PORTFOLIOS. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 81(1), 327–339.
Wallace, B. (2012). Teaching the very able child: developing a policy and adopting strategies for provision. Routledge.
