The Effectiveness of The Guided Discovery Learning (GDL) Method Using a Contextual Approach Reviewed from Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability of Senior High School in Muna District
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33477/mp.v7i1.1043Keywords:
discovery learning, contextual, critical thinking, mathAbstract
Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji efektivitas metode pembelajaran penemuan terbimbing menggunakan pendekatan kontekstual dalam hal keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa SMP. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah eksperimen semu. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah semua siswa kelas VIII Sekolah Menengah Atas di Kecamatan Kontukowuna, Kabupaten Muna, Sulawesi Tenggara pada tahun 2016/2017. Pengumpulan data diperoleh melalui penyediaan empat item pertanyaan instrumen tes keterampilan berpikir kritis, di mana setiap pertanyaan mewakili indikator kemampuan berpikir kritis dan lembar observasi pelaksanaan pembelajaran. Hasil penelitian dianalisis menggunakan uji t satu sampel. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa nilai uji t 2,719> (t_0,05,27) = 2,0518, yang dapat disimpulkan bahwa metode pembelajaran penemuan terbimbing efektif dalam hal kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMP. Hasil ini didukung oleh peningkatan rata-rata pretest 27,66 ke posttest 76,00 yang lebih tinggi dari kriteria penguasaan mengajar minimum (KKM) dari 70. Abstract This study aimed to test the effectiveness of guided discovery learning method using a contextual approach in terms of students' critical thinking skills of SMP. Type of research used was quasi experiment. Population in this research was all VIII grader students of Senior High School in sub-district Kontukowuna, Muna districts, Southeast Sulawesi in 2016/2017. Data collection was obtained through the provision of four items of question of critical thinking skills test instrumen, where each question represents an indicator of critical thinking ability and observation sheet of learning implementation. Research result was analyzed using one sample t test. The findings showed that t test value 2,719> (t_0.05,27) = 2.0518, which can be concluded that the guided discovery learning method was effective in terms of the critical thinking ability of junior high school students. This result was supported by the increase of average of pretest 27.66 to posttest 76.00 which was higher than the minimum teaching mastery criteria (KKM) of 70.References
Abdillah. (2017). Prediksi Nilai Mata Kuliah Mahasiswa Berdasarkan Nilai Raport, Pretest, dan Motivasi Belajar. Matematika dan Pembelajaran, 5(2), 121-140.
Baroody, A. J, Purpura, D. J, Eiland, M. D, & Reid, E. E. (2014). The Impact of Highly and Minimally Guided Discovery Instruction on Promoting the Learning of reasoning Strategies for Basic add-1 and doubles Combinations. Early Childhood Research Quarterly. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.09.003
Chambers, P & Timlin, R. (2013). Teaching Mathematics in the Secondary School. New Dehli: Sage Publications.
Clemete, C. H & Vesta. (2010). Contextual Teaching and Learning for Practitioners. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 6(4), 54-58.
CORD. (1999). Teaching Science Contextual the Cornerstone of Tech Prep. Texas: CORD Communications, Inc.
Crawford, M. L. (2001). Teaching Contextually: Research, Rationale, and Techniques for Improving Student Motivation and Achievement in Mathematics and Science. Waco, Texas: CCI Publishing.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research Design (Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed). (Terjemahan Achmad Fawaid). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Cruickshank, D. R, Jenkins, D. B, & Metcaft, K. K. (2012). The Act of Teaching (6th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Eggen, P & Kauchak, D. (2010). Educational Psychology Windows on Classrooms (8th ed). New York: Pearson Educational.
Ennis, R. H. (2011). The Natural of Critical Thinking: An Outline of Critical Thingking Disposition and Abilities. Sixth International Conference on Thinking at MIT.
Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Englewood Cliffs: Pearson Education.
Feldman, D. (2010). Berpikir Kritis Starategi Pengambilan Keputusan. Jakarta: PT Indeks.
Fisher, A. (2009). Berpikir Kritis Sebuah Pengantar. New York: Cambridge University Press. (Buku asli diterbitkan tahun 2007).
Glazer, E. (2001). Using Web Sources to Promote Critical Thinking in High School Mathematics. University of Georgia, United States of Americ, 67-71.
Imawan, O. R. (2015). Perbandingan antara Keefektifan Model Guided Discovery Learning dan Project-Based Learning pada Matakuliah Geometri. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 179-188.
Jacob, S.M. (2012). Mathematical achievement and critical thinking skills in asynchronous discussion forum. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 800-804.
Jhonson, E. B. (2014). Contextual Teaching and Learning Menjadi Kegiatan Belajar-Mengajar Mengasikan dan Bermakna. (Terjemahan Ibnu Setiawan). California: Corwin Press. (Buku asli diterbitkan tahun 2002).
Kurniati, Kusumah. Y. S, Sabandar, J, & Herman, T. (2015). Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Through Contextual Teaching and Learning Approach. IndoMS-JME, 6(1), 53-62.
Lau, J. Y. (2011). An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity Think More, Think Better. Canada: John Wiley & Sins Inc.
Mahmudi, A. (2009). Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Siswa melalui Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik. Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA (pp. 349-354). Yogyakarta: MIPA UNY.
Markaban. (2006). Model Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pendekatan Penemuan Terbimbing. Yogyakarta: Pusta Pengembangan dan Penataran Guru Matematika Yogyakarta.
Marsigit, Rizkianto. I & Murdiyani, N. M. (2015). Filsafat Matematika dan Praktis Pendidikan Matematika. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
Moore, K. D. (2012). Effective Instructional Strategis: From theory and practice. New York: Rountledge.
Mullis. A, Martin. M, Foy. P, & Arora. A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International Results in Mathematics. Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
Mustafa, A. N. (2014). Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif serta self-effcacy dalam Pembelajaran Matematika melalui Discovery Learning. Tesis Magister, tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
NCTM. (2000). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). New York: NCTM. Diambil kembali dari www.nctm.org.
Peter, E. E. (2012). Critical thinking: Essence for teaching mathematics and mathematics problem solving skills and mathematics problem solving skills. African Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science Research, 5(3), 39-43.
Putri, R. I & Santosa, R. H. (2015). Keefektifan Strategi REACT ditinjau dari Prestasi Belajar, Kemampuan Penyelesaian Masalah, Koneksi Matematis, Self Efficacy. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 262-272.
Siregar, N. C & Marsigit. (2015). Pengaruh Pendekatan Discovery Yang Menekankan Aspek Analogi Terhadap Prestasi Belajar, Kemampuan Penalaran, Kecerdasan Emosional Spiritual. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 224-234.
Syahbana, A. (2012). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa Smp Melalui Pendekatan Contextual Teaching And Learning. Edumatica, 2(1), 45-57.
Tittle, P. (2011). Critical Thinking An Appeal to Reason. New York: Routledge.
Van de Walle, J. A, Karp, K. S, & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2010). Elementry and Middle School Mathematics Teaching Developmentally (7th ed). Boston: Pearson.
Westwood, P. (2008). What Teachers Need to Know About Teaching Metods. Cambera: Acer Press.
Yuliani. K & Saragih. S. (2015). The Development of Learning Devices Based Guided Discovery Model to Improve Understanding Concept and Critical Thinking Mathematically Ability of Students at Islamic Junior High School of Medan. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(24), 116-128.
