Assessing Social Support and Emotionality of Students In Problem Solving

Authors

  • Intan Laelatul Mubarokah Department of Mathematics, Faculty Tarbiyah and Teacher Science IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33477/mp.v7i1.1044

Keywords:

Social support, student emotionality, mathematical problem solving

Abstract

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara social support dengan emosionalitas siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematika. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan menggunakan desain korelasional. Teknik pengambilan sampel dengan menggunakan purposive sampling dengan subyek penelitiannya siswa kelas XI IPA 2 sebanyak 39 siswa dan kelas XI IPA 3 sebanyak 40 siswa di MAN 2 Majalengka. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan angket pernyataan terhadap social support dan emosionalitas siswa. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Besaran social support yang diberikan terhadap siswa sebesar 81% dalam kategori sangat kuat dan kondisi emosionalitas siswa sebesar 81% dalam kategori sangat kuat. Selain itu, Hasil pengujian hipotesis menunjukan bahwa t_hitung 5,527 dengan nilai signifikansi 5,527> 2,000. Maka Ho ditolak dan Ha diterima, sehingga dapat maknai bahwa social support berhubungan dengan emosionalitas siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematika. Abstract This study aims to determine the relationship between social support and student emotionality in solving mathematical problems. This research is a quantitative study using correlational design. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling with the subjects of the XI IPA 2 class as many as 39 students and XI IPA 3 classes as many as 40 students in MAN 2 Majalengka. The data collection technique uses statement questionnaires for students' social support and emotionality. The results of this study indicate that the amount of social support given to students is 81% in the very strong category and the emotionality of students is 81% in the very strong category. In addition, the results of hypothesis testing indicate that t count is 5.527 with a significance value of 5.527> 2,000. Then HO is rejected and Ha is accepted so that it can mean that social support is related to student emotionality in mathematical problems solving.

References

Ball, S., & Vincent, C. (2001). New Class Relations in Education: The Strategies of The ‘Fearful’middle Classes. In Sociology of Education Today (pp. 180-195). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Britton, E., Huntley, M. A., Jacobs, G., & Weinberg, A. S. (1999). Connecting Mathematics and Science to Workplace Contexts: A Guide to Curriculum Materials. Corwin Press, Inc., A Sage Publications Company, 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-5323.

Carmeli, A. (2003). The Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and Work Attitudes, Behavior and Outcomes: An Examination Among Senior Managers. Journal of managerial Psychology, 18(8), 788-813.

Cross, C. T., Woods, T. A., & Schweingruber, H. E. (2009). Mathematics Learning in Early Childhood: Paths Toward Excellence and Equity. National Academies Press.

Di Matteo, M. R. (1991). The Psychology of Health, Illness, and Medical care. Pasific Grove, California: Brooks.

DiMatteo, M. R. (1991). The Psychology of Health, Illness, and Medical Care. Pasific Grove, California: Brooks / Cole Publishing Company

Goleman, D. (2003). Working with Emotional Intelligence. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Goleman, D. (2009). Emotional intelligence; kecerdasan emosional, mengapa EI lebih penting dari IQ. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Gumilar, M. C. (2015). Penerapan Pendekatan Inkuiri Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran IPA Kelas V Sekolah Dasar (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia).

Kamsari, K., & Winarso, W. (2018). Implikasi Tingkat Kecerdasan Logika Matematika Siswa terhadap Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Edu Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematika, 6(1), 44-52.

Kumalasari, F., & Ahyani, L. N. (2012). Hubungan antara dukungan sosial dengan penyesuaian diri remaja di panti asuhan. Jurnal Psikologi: PITUTUR, 1(1), 19-28.

Mangkunegara, A. P. (2010). Evaluasi Kinerja SDM. In Evaluasi Kinerja SDM (p. 76). Bandung: Refika Aditama

Mousoulides, N., Sriraman, B., & Christou, C. (2007). From problem solving to modelling. Education, 12(1), 23-47.

Orford. (1992). Community Psychology: Theory and practice. John-Wiley and Son.

Orton, A. (1992). Learning mathematics: Issues, theory and practice. Great Britain: Redwood Books.

Papalia, D. E., & Olds, S. W. (1981). Human development. McGraw-Hill Companies.

Rahmasari, L. (2016). Pengaruh Kecerdasan Intelektual, Kecerdasan Emosi dan Kecerdasan Spiritual Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. Majalah Ilmiah Informatika, 3(1).1-20

Rice, F. P., & Vestal, L. B. (1998). Human development: A life-span approach. American: Wadsworth

Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). " Should I ask for help?" The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescents' help seeking in math class. Journal of educational psychology, 89(2), 329.

Sarafino, E. P., & Smith, T. W. (2014). Health psychology: Biopsychosocial interactions. John Wiley & Sons.

Sarafino, Edward.P. (2002). Health Psychology: biopsychosocial interaction. (4thedition). New York.

Sarason, I. G., Levine, H. M., Basham, R. B., & Sarason, B. R. (1983). Assessing social support: The social support questionnaire. Journal of personality and social psychology, 44(1), 127.

Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1997). Understanding and improving classroom mathematics instruction: An overview of the TIMSS video study. In ACER National Conference 1997 (pp. 52-65).

Sugiyono, P. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif Dan R&D. Alpabeta, Bandung.

Sujono. (1998). Pengajaran Matematika untuk Sekolah Menengah. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Sukardi. (2009). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan(Kompetensi dan Praktiknya). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sumadi, S. (2004). Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung: Pustaka Setia

Sumirat, L. A. (2013). Efektifitas strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe think-talk-write (TTW) terhadap kemampuan komunikasi dan disposisi matematis siswa (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Terbuka).

Syamarro, N., Saluky, S., & Winarso, W. (2015). Pengaruh Motivasi Dan Persepsi Siswa Pada Matematika Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII Di Mts Al-hidayah Dukupuntang Kabupaten Cirebon (Pokok Bahasan Kubus Dan Balok). Eduma: Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 4(2).105-111

Uno, H. B. (2009). Teori motivasi dan Pengukurannya (Analisis di Bidang Pendidikan). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Waller, N. G., Tellegen, A., McDonald, R. P., & Lykken, D. T. (1996). Exploring nonlinear models in personality assessment: Development and preliminary validation of a negative emotionality scale. Journal of Personality, 64(3), 545-576.

Wheatley, G. H. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning. Science education, 75(1), 9-21.

Winarso, W., & Supriady, D. (2016). Menilai Prestasi Belajar melalui Penguatan Self Regulated Learning dan Kecerdasan Emosional Siswa pada Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 3(2).

Yashinta, A. P., & Ariyanti, G. (2015). Pengaruh Kecerdasan Emosional Terhadap Prestasi Dan Sikap Belajar Matematika Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Ekspositori. Educatio Vitae, 2(1).1-10

Yuliana, R. (2017). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Dengan Pendekatan PMRI pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Lengkung Untuk SMP Kelas IX. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika-S1, 6(1), 60-67.

Downloads

Published

2019-11-13